this product is unavailable for purchase using a firm account, please log in with a personal account to make this purchase.

LIV offices remain closed until further notice.

Though we are working remotely to support our members.

Find out more
Select from any of the filters or enter a search term
Calendar
Calendar

Public drunkenness laws should be abolished

Public drunkenness laws should be abolished

By LIV Media

0 Comments


Abolishing public drunkenness laws will help protect vulnerable members of our community, according to the Law Institute of Victoria.

LIV President Sam Pandya said the LIV has long supported moves to abolish the relevant provisions of the Summary Offences Act 1966 which provide that it is an offence to be drunk in a public place, even if no disorderly or disruptive behaviour is proved.

“Public drunkenness requires a health response, not a criminal justice response,” Mr Pandya said.

“Many inquiries including Royal Commissions have found that public drunkenness laws have a disproportionate effect on Indigenous Australians, and their arrest for these offences can result in their death,” Mr Pandya said.

The LIV has recommended to the government that legislation decriminalising public drunkenness should place a duty on police officers to consider and use alternatives to police cells, including the option of taking the intoxicated person home or using community services.

It is also recommended that the law reform should be accompanied by adequately funded programs to establish and maintain non-custodial facilities for the care and treatment of intoxicated people.

Mr Pandya said it was premature of the Police Association to claim that police might “do nothing” if proposed laws “water down their powers”.

He said while the Government had announced it would introduce legislation before the end of the year, it had also committed to a 24-month implementation period. This will allow for further consultation with police, communities and the legal profession about the proposed reforms.

Victoria and Queensland are the only Australian jurisdictions that have failed to implement the recommendation to abolish the offence contained in the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody in 1991.

 


Views expressed on liv.asn.au (Website) are not necessarily endorsed by the Law Institute of Victoria Ltd (LIV).

The information, including statements, opinions, documents and materials contained on the Website (Website Content) is for general information purposes only. The Website Content does not take into account your specific needs, objectives or circumstances, and it is not legal advice or services. Any reliance you place on the Website Content is at your own risk.

To the maximum extent permitted by law, the LIV excludes all liability for any loss or damage of any kind (including special, indirect or consequential loss and including loss of business profits) arising out of or in connection with the Website Content and the use or performance of the Website except to the extent that the loss or damage is directly caused by the LIV’s fraud or wilful misconduct.

Be the first to comment